I am a bit confused there: The suitcase of the lady does have no item in it, except in the last picture. Is this intended?
23275: Mystik - Friday, August 28 2020 - 4:37 AM
I think thereā€™s a typo on panel one where she says stimulate instead of stipulate
23276: TGWMoC - Friday, August 28 2020 - 6:59 AM
@Gordon She just put it in at some point between panels 4 and 6.
@Mystik I thought she just meant goad him into doing it, since she might not think they could force him. So stimulate would make sense. Also, 'stipulate that infinite man *to* go first' doesn't read right.
23277: Kiithnaras - Friday, August 28 2020 - 7:55 AM
Yeah, I'm also perplexed. She says one apple and could be lying, and all previous panels show her case has zero, but the last panel shows her case with one apple.
23278: Zed - Friday, August 28 2020 - 8:03 AM
Yeah, there is a 0 on her suitcase in one panel, then in the final panel there is a 1. The former is more obviously in-panel, so I am assuming the latter one was a mistake. Interesting either way.
23279: Tor - Friday, August 28 2020 - 8:57 AM
Its because the lady put her own chip in between panels.
23280: Gorzag - Friday, August 28 2020 - 8:59 AM
The suitcase in panel 4 says "000", but the same suitcase in panel 6 says "001". Is this intended?
23281: Brilliand - Friday, August 28 2020 - 9:42 AM
@Mystic "Stimulate" can mean "cause", which makes sense in context. "Stipulate" would make the sentence ungrammatical, because that verb doesn't take a direct object.
23282: Saiko - Friday, August 28 2020 - 12:03 PM
They put the chips in just before committing trade, and after negotiation. They both start with counter at 000.
23283: anon - Friday, August 28 2020 - 5:10 PM
Haha, stimulate.
Brilliand is incorrect - "stipulate that [clause]" is a very common construction, and in fact "stipulate" would not be a very useful word if it couldn't be used that way.
23284: Gorfel - Friday, August 28 2020 - 8:07 PM
I'm very confused. In panel 2 Tobi's suitcase has no green at all, but in panels 5 and 6 it suddenly has a GREEN 1. Is this intended?
23285: Benedict - Friday, August 28 2020 - 8:16 PM
I'm just surprised this plan was legit and wasn't just Levin trying some kind of backstabby shenanigans against his own team for some reason. It was super sus! So... I guess the way in which this is all a trap is... something else.
23286: someone - Saturday, August 29 2020 - 2:31 AM
this solves the question of whether levin lied to scam everybody. For everybody but levin.
I am a bit confused there: The suitcase of the lady does have no item in it, except in the last picture. Is this intended?
I think thereā€™s a typo on panel one where she says stimulate instead of stipulate
@Gordon She just put it in at some point between panels 4 and 6.
@Mystik I thought she just meant goad him into doing it, since she might not think they could force him. So stimulate would make sense. Also, 'stipulate that infinite man *to* go first' doesn't read right.
Yeah, I'm also perplexed. She says one apple and could be lying, and all previous panels show her case has zero, but the last panel shows her case with one apple.
Yeah, there is a 0 on her suitcase in one panel, then in the final panel there is a 1. The former is more obviously in-panel, so I am assuming the latter one was a mistake. Interesting either way.
Its because the lady put her own chip in between panels.
The suitcase in panel 4 says "000", but the same suitcase in panel 6 says "001". Is this intended?
@Mystic "Stimulate" can mean "cause", which makes sense in context. "Stipulate" would make the sentence ungrammatical, because that verb doesn't take a direct object.
They put the chips in just before committing trade, and after negotiation. They both start with counter at 000.
Haha, stimulate.
Brilliand is incorrect - "stipulate that [clause]" is a very common construction, and in fact "stipulate" would not be a very useful word if it couldn't be used that way.
I'm very confused. In panel 2 Tobi's suitcase has no green at all, but in panels 5 and 6 it suddenly has a GREEN 1. Is this intended?
I'm just surprised this plan was legit and wasn't just Levin trying some kind of backstabby shenanigans against his own team for some reason. It was super sus! So... I guess the way in which this is all a trap is... something else.
this solves the question of whether levin lied to scam everybody. For everybody but levin.